We won't spam, rent, sell, or share
your information in any way.
Hal Lindsey claims that the Bible predicts that oil will be discovered in Israel.  The book Breaking the Treasure Code: The Hunt for Israel's Oil  claims to prove it by an appeal to the Bible:
A treasure map was hidden in the Bible more than three thousand years ago. The treasure, a gift from God to Israel, was buried in the sands of the Promised Land to ensure her prosperity and protection. "Breaking the Treasure Code" pieces the map together and reveals the clues that lead to a vast oil reserve; the source of Israel's wealth and the key to her survival in the last days.
That's the good news. Now the bad news. Israel will be invaded. "The interesting thing is," Lindsey writes, "that this invasion will be triggered by the enormous wealth that the nation accumulates in this time." Israel just can't win. The Arab countries have been swimming in oil for decades and living the luxurious life from the accumulated revenue, but soon as Israel discovers the long-buried energy source, she's going to be invaded! Bummer.
Israel may in fact discover oil. This would not be too surprising since the region is glutted with the black gold. But can a biblical case be made for the prophetic significance of oil as it relates to Israel and a future end-time scenario made popular by writers like Lindsey? Let's follow Lindsey's line of logic through Scripture to see if he has made his case.
Lindsey quotes part of Genesis 49:25 (in italic) which describes the blessings that will come to Joseph: "From the God of your father who helps you, and by the Almighty who blesses you with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lies beneath, blessings of the breasts and of the womb." Lindsey says of this verse: "Note that it predicts his great blessing will come from 'the deep that lies beneath' his land." By "deep," Lindsey means oil buried deep in the ground!
A careful reader would have looked up the verses quoted by Lindsey (Acts 17:11) and noticed that he conveniently left out "breasts and of the womb." The dispensational oriented Bible Knowledge Commentary states that this phrase refers to "abundant offspring."  Henry M. Morris, a noted dispensationalist, agrees and writes that it's a promise of "an abundance of healthful progeny, of both man and animal."  Gerhard Charles Aalders, not a dispensationalist, concurs with the above authors: "'Blessings of the breast and womb' certainly refer to abundance in the bearing and feeding of children, as well as for human children as for the young of the livestock." 
Earlier in Genesis we read of a promise of an increase in population that would result in Israel being as numerous "as the stars of the heavens, and as the sand which is on the seashore" (22:17; cf. 32:12).  And when was this fulfilled?:
If Genesis 49:25 refers to the distant future, as Lindsey speculates, then there is a problem. By the year 2020, Arnon Sofer of the University of Haifa forecasts about 6.4 million Jews will live in Israel, "based on population growth and an average 50,000 Jewish immigrants a year. He expects the Arab population to reach around 8.5 million, in addition to 1 million non-Jews of other origins."  The most optimistic projections show Jews and Palestinians about even in population in 25 years.  Beyond the borders of Israel, there are more than a hundred million non-Jews. It seems by present-day demographics that in comparison, it's the wombs of Israel's enemies that have been blessed.
Lindsey believes the phrase "the deep that lies beneath" is a reference to crude oil. As far as I can tell, he's the first person to make this discovery. If the "deep" refers to oil, then what are the "blessings of heaven above"? He doesn't say. You can see that Genesis 49:25 is a classic example of Hebrew parallelism. How does one of Lindsey's fellow dispensationalists interpret the passage? "Blessings from heaven above" is a reference to "rain for crops," while "from the deep" refers to "streams and wells for water"  (Gen. 7:11; 8:2; Deut. 33:13). H. C. Leupold captures the meaning of the Hebrew imagery:
The following blessings are specialized: first "blessings of the heavens above"-those would be such blessings as the heavens hold within their grasp-rain, sunshine and pleasant breezes. Then follow "blessings of the deep," i.e. tehom, the deep source of the subterranean waters, which is pictured as being "that coutheth (or croucheth) beneath" the earth. This involves the waters stored in the earth that are so essential to all vegetable growth as well as the sources of the much needed streams and of the fountains. 
Contextually, this interpretation makes sense since the lack of rain and dry wells, especially for people living in a region not far from desert conditions, would invariably lead to failed crops and depleted livestock. There is nothing in all of Genesis 49 that would lead the interpreter to conclude that crude oil is buried in the deep. Lindsey is reading modern-day geo-politics and technology into the text. He did a similar thing in his 1973 book There's a New World Coming when he seems to accept the identification of the locusts that came up out of the pit in Revelation 9 as Vietnam-era "Cobra helicopters." 
Lindsey continues by appealing to Deuteronomy 33:24 to support his crude oil theory: "And of Asher he said, 'More blessed than sons is Asher; may he be favored by his brothers, and may he dip his foot in oil.'" Once again, Lindsey is projecting a verse meant for a contemporary context and setting into the distant future to fit a system of interpretation that requires a future context and setting. The "oil" of this verse is a reference to "olive oil." Jack S. Deere, writing on Deuteronomy in the dispensational oriented Bible Knowledge Commentary, states that "to bathe one's feet in oil rather than simply to anoint them would be an extravagant act. Thus the tribe of Asher would experience abundant fertility and prosperity."  Jan Ridderbos makes a similar observation: "his land will be so rich in oil that it is possible, so to speak, to wade in it. Indeed, Galilee, Asher's territory, was rich in olive trees."  J. A. Thompson adds further insight to the meaning of the passage:
The last phrase in verse 24, He dips (or, may he dip) his feet in oil is to be understood as a wish that Asher may enjoy prosperity. The Galilean highlands were famous for olives and both Josephus and one of the Jewish Midrashim refer to this fact. The latter contains the saying, 'It is easier to raise a legion of olives in Galilee than to bring up a child in Palestine.' 
"The land of Asher was agriculturally rich, and is still known for its olive groves."  Once again, determining the context and setting are crucial in determining the meaning of a text.
Did the prophecies concerning Asher come to pass? Throughout the Old Testament, Asher is identified as a tribe blessed by God (1 Chron. 7:40; 12:36) and a protector of the nation (Judges 6:1-8, 35; 7:23; 1 Sam. 11:7; 1 Chron. 12:23, 36). Asher is one of the few tribes even mentioned in the New Testament. While many Israelites were "dispersed abroad" (James 1:1), a descendant from the tribe of Asher was waiting for the promised Messiah in Jerusalem (Luke 2:36), a wonderful fulfillment of prophecy.
When the word "oil" appears in the Bible, it is never a reference to crude oil or petroleum but olive oil.  Petroleum substances (bitumen) were known and used in Bible times, but they were not identified as "oil." There were pools of an asphalt-like material often translated as "pitch" or "tar" (KJV: "slime"): "Now the valley of Siddim was full of tar pits. . ." (Gen. 11:14). The "pitch" or "tar" was used for waterproofing (Gen. 6:14; Ex. 2:3) and mortar (Gen. 11:3). If God wanted to identify a future discovery of crude oil in Genesis 49:25 and Deuteronomy 33:24, He could have chosen any of the Hebrew terms already in use at that time to make the point.
Given the way dispensationalists continually read the Bible through the lens of modern-day events and refuse to acknowledge the time texts and the contemporary context of so many passages, the Bible can be made to say almost anything. Consider this verse: "He reveals mysteries from the darkness, and brings the deep darkness into light" (Job 12:22). The use of oil as a fuel to run automobiles, buses, trucks, and other motorized vehicles would have been a "mystery" to the people of Job's day. Drilling into the earth to get out the oil would have been inconceivable. Of course, because oil is deep in the ground, it's in perpetual "darkness"-the darkest of the dark since oil itself is dark. But the oil drillers bring the darkness into light. Once oil is struck, it gushes into the brightness of day. Job was prophesying about the discovery of oil! It says so right in the Bible!
Dispensationalists like Hal Lindsey insist that they interpret the Bible literally, and everyone else is an allegorizer. Tim LaHaye tries to sell this point in the Introduction to Mark Hitchcock and Thomas Ice's The Truth About Left Behind:
Jerry [Jenkins] and I have unashamedly taken the position that all prophecy should be interpreted literally whenever possible. We have been guided throughout by the golden rule of interpretation: When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense. Take every word at its primary, literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context clearly indicate otherwise. 
If only it were so. Lindsey, who follows the same "golden rule," is certainly not applying the principle in Genesis 49:25, Deuteronomy 33:24, and Ezekiel 38-39, and neither are LaHaye, Ice, and Hitchcock in their interpretation of Ezekiel 38-39 where ancient weapons are said to be descriptions of Russian MIG fighters. Like snake-oil salesmen, these modern-day prophetic hucksters are selling false remedies to a gullible audience willing to believe anything their prophetic heroes say about their product.