The debate between evolutionists and creationists has become so specialized that the average person with basic knowledge of biology cannot follow the argumentation.
Full Story »My Introductory Comments at the Dayton to Dothan
The debate between creation and evolution has a long history. The first public debate between a creationist and a Darwinist was probably the one where Samuel Wilberforce, bishop of Oxford, and Thomas H. Huxley, known as Darwin’s Bulldog
Full Story »Michael Vick: Appeal to Darwin!
We live in a topsy-turvy world. News articles have reported that Michael Vick has found Jesus. Since the popularity of the atheist tomes by Hitchens, Harris, Dennett, and Dawkins, I would have called on these defenders of Darwin and the no-God hypothesis
Full Story »Dopey Little Particles
Question: When is an extreme act of altruism actually the ultimate demonstration of self-love? Answer: When it is motivated by natural selection. At least according to Robert Wright in a recent editorial written in response to the evolutionary despondency of Robert Brooks.
Full Story »The Evolutionary Blame Game
Now that the shock of the Virginia Tech massacre has turned to scapegoat-hunting and finger-pointing, we can be sure that we will be offered numerous villains and causes over the next several weeks by the media.
Full Story »Hardwired Nonsense
Evolutionists claim that morality is a product of evolution. As we saw in yesterday’s article, Marc Hauser claims that “evolution hardwired us to know right from wrong.” How did evolution, which is not a person, place, or thing, know what is morally acceptable?
Full Story »Has Anyone Seen Evolution?
Marc Hauser, a Harvard evolutionary biologist, believes that “evolution hardwired us to know right from wrong . . . based on instincts encoded in our brains by evolution.”
Full Story »Why Dispensationalists Can’t Argue for a Young Earth and a Global Flood
Michael Ruse, Professor of Philosophy at Florida State University, devotes a chapter to the subject of eschatology in his book The Evolution-Creation Struggle.[1] He believes that the interpretive methodology of dispensational premillennialism is inexorably linked to the way its advocates defend their position on creation.
Full Story »Evolution is a Joke
Julie Haberle, 55, of Minnetonka, Minnesota, used to believe in evolution. Nine years ago she dismissed creationism as being “nuts.” After studying the issue, she has come to the conclusion that “evolution is just silly.”[1] It’s no wonder after reading how the highly controlled evolutionary model is defended. Consider the following:
Full Story »Let the Evolutionists Win
I think we should let the evolutionists have their way. They oppose any mention of creation in government schools, even rejecting the notion of Intelligent Design. They see the Scopes Trial of 1925 as the turning point for the upsurge in evolutionary legitimacy.
Full Story »
