The debate between creation and evolution has a long history. The first public debate between a creationist and a Darwinist was probably the one where Samuel Wilberforce, bishop of Oxford, and Thomas H. Huxley, known as Darwin’s Bulldog
Full Story »
The debate between creation and evolution has a long history. The first public debate between a creationist and a Darwinist was probably the one where Samuel Wilberforce, bishop of Oxford, and Thomas H. Huxley, known as Darwin’s Bulldog
Full Story »
Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis(AiG) sees the newly opened Creation Museum contributing to the fulfillment of Jesus’ prophetic words in Matthew 24:14:
Full Story »
Michael Ruse, Professor of Philosophy at Florida State University, devotes a chapter to the subject of eschatology in his book The Evolution-Creation Struggle.[1] He believes that the interpretive methodology of dispensational premillennialism is inexorably linked to the way its advocates defend their position on creation.
Full Story »
Julie Haberle, 55, of Minnetonka, Minnesota, used to believe in evolution. Nine years ago she dismissed creationism as being “nuts.” After studying the issue, she has come to the conclusion that “evolution is just silly.”[1] It’s no wonder after reading how the highly controlled evolutionary model is defended. Consider the following:
Full Story »
The Bible makes a distinction between God and the world. God did not make the world and us because, as some Sunday School teachers tell their impressionable students, because He was lonely. If the world disappeared in a vapor, God would not be affected. God does not need us or the world. He created it and us for His own glory, and He expects us to use it according to His requirements, neither abusing it or neglecting it.
Full Story »