The debate between evolutionists and creationists has become so specialized that the average person with basic knowledge of biology cannot follow the argumentation.
Full Story »
The debate between evolutionists and creationists has become so specialized that the average person with basic knowledge of biology cannot follow the argumentation.
Full Story »
Julie Haberle, 55, of Minnetonka, Minnesota, used to believe in evolution. Nine years ago she dismissed creationism as being “nuts.” After studying the issue, she has come to the conclusion that “evolution is just silly.”[1] It’s no wonder after reading how the highly controlled evolutionary model is defended. Consider the following:
Full Story »
I think we should let the evolutionists have their way. They oppose any mention of creation in government schools, even rejecting the notion of Intelligent Design. They see the Scopes Trial of 1925 as the turning point for the upsurge in evolutionary legitimacy.
Full Story »
Patricia Princehouse of the Department of Biology at Case Western Reserve University has issued a challenge to any and all Intelligent Design advocates to debate “the ‘science’ of ID” in “Cleveland the first week in January” 2006.
Full Story »