http://americanvision.org/2952/penguins-dog-vomit-and-human-sexuality/ Wed, 23 May 2012 13:33:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://americanvision.org/2952/penguins-dog-vomit-and-human-sexuality/comment-page-1/#comment-8455 Cassie Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:40:48 +0000 http://americanvision.org/2952/penguins-dog-vomit-and-human-sexuality/#comment-8455 The flaw within this argument is obvious. I don't think any homosexual thinks it is correct merely because it is natural. This is merely a response to the churches assertion that it is "unnatural". Again this is just proving conservative christian arguments as flawed not about establishing their own arguments. There are two seperate areas in debate "for" and "against" on both sides of the fence. Saying that homosexual sex is natural is against anti-homosexuality not an argument for homosexual rights. There is a subtle difference, but a difference all the same. You to respond to why you still think it is unnatural even when you have been provided with evidence to show it isn't. The flaw within this argument is obvious. I don't think any homosexual thinks it is correct merely because it is natural. This is merely a response to the churches assertion that it is "unnatural". Again this is just proving conservative christian arguments as flawed not about establishing their own arguments. There are two seperate areas in debate "for" and "against" on both sides of the fence. Saying that homosexual sex is natural is against anti-homosexuality not an argument for homosexual rights. There is a subtle difference, but a difference all the same. You to respond to why you still think it is unnatural even when you have been provided with evidence to show it isn't.

]]>