Articles Ethics Government Law
Setting the Historical Record Straight
Oct 13, 2008
7
"Article

I noted with interest the comments of John Manzi (”Secular Nation,” Oct. 7, 2008) in the Charleston Post and Courier and sent a version of this article to the editorial department for publication. Mr. Manzi contends that the United States was founded as a secular nation. There is no doubt that there are secular elements in the founding of America, but there are many more Christian elements that Mr. Manzi ignores.

In support of his claim, Mr. Manzi references a number of historical sources. He alleges, for example, that Thomas Jefferson wrote that “Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man.” There is no record of Jefferson ever writing such a statement. There is no doubt that Jefferson was critical of the clergy and believed that Christianity had been corrupted by Jesus’ followers, but he never described Christianity in the above terms.[1]

George Washington never wrote a treaty as Mr. Manzi contends. The Treaty of Tripoli that Mr. Manzi refers to was drafted in 1797 by Jeol Barlow near the end of Washington’s administration. It was ratified during Adams’ administration. The phrase “the Government of the United States . . . is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion” is found in the treaty. It was designed, as the context suggests, to appease leaders of Muslim nations who were commandeering ships, kidnapping sailors, and selling them into slavery. Barbary was described as “Christendom’s Gulag Archipelago.” The treaty was renegotiated in 1805 under Jefferson’s administration and the above phrase was removed. A 1783 treaty with Great Britain includes the following phrases: “In the name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity . . . Divine Providence . . . Grace of God.” A treaty with Russia in 1822 opens with these words: “In the name of the Most Holy and Indivisible Trinity.” The 1848 Treaty with Mexico begins with “In the name of Almighty God.”[2]

The Constitution sets Sunday aside as a day of rest for the President in Article 1, section 7. Just above George Washington’s signature the following phrase appears: “Done in the Year of our Lord . . . One thousand seven hundred and eighty seven.” This is direct reference to Jesus Christ.

The 1776 constitution of North Carolina, that remained in effect until 1868, included the following (XXXII): “That no person, who shall deny the being of God, or the truth of the Protestant religion, or the divine authority either of the Old or New Testaments, or who shall hold religious principles incompatible with the freedom and safety of the State, shall be capable of holding any office or place of trust or profit in the civil department within this State.”[3] North Carolina describes itself as a “Christian State” in the 1868 constitution (Art. XI, sec. 7). This same constitution stated that “all persons who shall deny the being of Almighty God” “shall be disqualified for office.”[4] These truths hardly support Mr. Manzi’s claims.

South Carolina’s original constitution of 1778 states that “no person shall be eligible to a seat in the said senate unless he be of the Protestant religion, and hath attained the age of thirty years, and hath been a resident in this State at least five years.” (Art. XII). Article XXXVIII reads like a church constitution whereby “The Christian Protestant religion shall be deemed, and is hereby constituted and declared to be, the established religion of this State.” The following were minimal requirements for churches in the state:

1st. That there is one eternal God, and a future state of rewards and punishments.

2d. That God is publicly to be worshipped.

3d. That the Christian religion is the true religion

4th. That the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are of divine inspiration, and are the rule of faith and practice.

5th. That it is lawful and the duty of every man being thereunto called by those that govern, to bear witness to the truth.[5]

If we follow Jefferson’s claim, as Mr. Manzi thinks we should do, that “to talk of immaterial existences is to talk of nothings,” of which he included God, then Jefferson refutes himself. He believed in God. He was an author of the Declaration of Independence that states that our rights come from “the Creator” and that He is the “Supreme Judge of the world.”[6] He also believed in reason, logic, and numbers. These “things” are not material, and yet I doubt that Jefferson would claim that “they are nothings.”

Mr. Manzi takes John Adams out of context when he states that our second president claimed that Christianity was “the most bloody religion that ever existed.” He was referring to those who corrupted it, and I and other Christians would agree with him. In another place, Adams stated, “The Christian religion is, above all the Religions that ever prevailed or existed in ancient or modern Times, the Religion of Wisdom, Virtue, Equity, and humanity, let the Blackguard [Thomas] Paine say what he will; it is Resignation to God, it is Goodness itself to Man.”[7]

Mr. Manzi quotes Benjamin Franklin, but he fails to mention that it was this elder statesman who stood up at the Constitutional Convention and appealed for prayer and made reference to three specific passages from the Bible. His most direct was Psalm 127:1: “Unless the Lord builds the house, they labor in vain who build it.” He went on to state that if we as a nation fail to acknowledge God’s role in the establishment of our nation, then we will do no better than the builders of Babel.[8]

I could go on in my critique of Mr. Manzi’s historical research, but you get the picture. He has gone to the internet and found a few quips, some of which do not exist, strung them together and built a case that rests on historical sand.

Footnotes:
[1]From the “Th. Jefferson Encyclopedia”: “This quotation has so far not been found in any of the sources available to us. However, it may possibly be a misleading paraphrase of the following:
“…but a short time elapsed after the death of the great reformer of the Jewish religion before his principles were departed from by those who professed to be his special servants, & perverted into an engine for enslaving mankind, and aggrandizing their oppressors in church & state: that the purest system of morals ever before preached to man has been adulterated & sophisticated, by artificial constructions, into a mere contrivance to filch wealth & power to themselves, that rational men not being able to swallow their impious heresies, in order to force them down their throats, they raise the hue & cry of infidelity, while themselves are the greatest obstacles to the advancement of the real doctrines of Jesus, and do in fact constitute the real Anti-Christ.” (Thomas Jefferson to William Baldwin, 19 January 1810 [draft-never sent]). [The draft copy can be found at the Library of Congress, at http://memory.loc.gov/master/mss/mtj/mtj1/044/0500/0530.jpg, mistakenly labeled “Mr Samuel Kercheval.”]
Also seemingly contradicting the quotation in question is the following:
“No doctrines of [Jesus’] lead to schism. It is the speculations of crazy theologists which have made a Babel of a religion the most moral and sublime ever preached to man, and calculated to heal, and not to create differences. These religious animosities I impute to those who call themselves his ministers, and who engraft their casuistries on the stock of his simple precepts. I am sometimes more angry with them than is authorised by the blessed charities which he preached.” (Thomas Jefferson to Ezra Stiles Ely, Monticello, 25 June 1819). [Polygraph copy at the Library of Congress, Thomas Jefferson Papers:  http://memory.loc.gov/master/mss/mtj/mtj1/051/0600/0654.jpg]
The source of the above material can be found at http://tinyurl.com/3hpye9
[2]
For a comprehensive study of the Treaty of Tripoli, see Gary DeMar, “America’s 200-Year War with Terror.” Available on request at mail@AmericanVision.org
[3]
Thorpe, The Federal and State Constitutions, 5:2793. The same 1776 constitution stated that “no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function” (5:2793). This provision demonstrates the true meaning of “separation of church and state.”
[4]
Francis Newton Thorpe, The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters and Other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies, 7 vols. (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1909), 5:2815.
[5]
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/states/sc02.htm
[6]
http://www.christianparents.com/declarid.htm
[7]
Gary DeMar, “John Adams Under the Microscope”: http://americanvision.org/articlearchive/02-11-05.asp
[8]
http://www.usconstitution.net/franklin.html

 

Print Friendly

About author

Gary DeMar

Gary is a graduate of Western Michigan University (1973) and earned his M.Div. at Reformed Theological Seminary in 1979. He is the author of countless essays, news articles, and more than 27 book titles, His most recent book is Exposing the Real Last Days Scoffers. Gary lives in Marietta, Georgia, with his wife, Carol. They have two married sons and four grandchildren, Gary and Carol are members of Midway Presbyterian Church (PCA).

Related items

You may (or may not) like these as well

mark for Vetta pse jane

Finding the cure for rapture theology trauma

Read more
Captain America

“If I were President.” Ha.

Read more
corporate fascism

Food stamps for fascists

Read more